I’ve been all about astronomy lately (thanks, Curiosity).
And while I’ve talked about it before, it still baffles me that people think
Christianity and science don’t go together. I don’t know who bothers me more,
secularists who dismiss all believers as illogical idiots or the ignorant
believers who perpetuate that stereotype (actually, I do know; it’s the
latter). So my quick takes are about some religious men that made big
contributions to math and science:
1. St. Albert the Great is the patron saint of scientists, philosophers,
the natural sciences, and medical
technicians. He entered into the priesthood after a vision from Blessed Virgin
Mary. He studied Aristotle and Muslim academics and wrote on reconciling
philosophy with the natural sciences. He set up personal laboratories where he
experimented in chemistry and physics and collected insects and plants. He
believed knowledge of nature pointed to knowledge of God. (St. Thomas Aquinas
studied under Albert.)
2. Georges Lemaitre was a Belgian priest and
astronomer. He was the first person to propose the theory of the expanding
universe and the Big Bang, which contrasted with Einstein’s static universe
model of the time. Lemaitre’s conclusions suggested that there was a finite
point, “a day without yesterday,” from which the universe began and continues
to expand. He kept his research and religious life separate, believing there
was neither confirmation nor conflict between the two.
3. Gregor Mendel was an Augustan friar who is often credited
as the father of the study of genetics. His work included beekeeping and plant
breeding. He tested around 29,000 pea plants; his studies showed the presence
of recessive and dominant traits. His theories were carried over to his
beekeeping. At the time (mid-nineteenth century), most scientists believed
traits were a blend of the parents in animals, but Mendel’s work demonstrated
the theory of recessive and dominant genes that was later accepted and became
known as Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance.
4. Roger Boscovich was a Jesuit from what is now Croatia who
studied physics and astronomy. He developed the first geometric procedure for
determining the circumference of a rotating planet. For example, he found a way
of determining the Sun’s equator and the period of its rotation by observing
spots on its surface. His ideas on explaining physical behavior in terms of
force rather than static matter are credited as the foundation for nineteenth
century atomic theory. In 1753, he was the first to note the absence of an
atmosphere on the moon. He travelled often, and also served as an engineering
consultant. One of these consulting projects was repairs to St. Peter’s Dome,
where he also served as a confessor.
5. Landell de Moura was a Brazilian priest and inventor who
studied sound wave transmissions after being introduced to Alexander Graham
Bell’s telephone while in Europe. In 1904, he received U.S. patents for his
wireless telephone (which used a combination of three earlier telephone
systems) and wireless telegraph. He worked to increase Brazil’s technical
knowledge and demonstrate that scientific study was compatible with Church
doctrines.
6. Francesco Faa di Bruno was a nineteenth century mathematics
professor from Sardina. He was heavily involved in creating refuges for the
elderly, poor, and prostitutes. He joined the priesthood late in life, hoping
Holy Orders would help him continue his service. In his career, he studied
algorithmic approaches to eliminating between polynomials of variables in algebraic
geometry. A formula, which generalizes the chain rule to higher derivatives, is
named after him. Faa di Bruno was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1988.
7. A note on Galileo Galilei: the house arrest of Galileo is
probably the most common event thrown around when someone is trying to say the
Church is anti-science. The reality is that the Church had supported Galileo’s
astronomy studies. However, an inquisition found that his heliocentric theory
lacked the credentials of the day to be considered absolute fact and would be
considered only a scientific possibility. In 1632, Galileo wrote a defense of
his theories in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. It was written
with permission from Pope Urban VII, however, after it was published, Galileo
was found guilty of heresies. It was believed that Pope Urban’s arguments were unjustly
presented in the book by the buffoonish character Simplicio and that Galileo
had tried to tell the Church how to interpret the Bible. Galileo’s trial had
more to do with the political atmosphere of the time than any Church position
on astronomy.
To be fair, fear of the theological ramifications of a moving Earth did play some role. Books on heliocentric theory were banned by the Church from
1615 to 1757. (Isaac Newton’s works helped in lifting the ban.) So, I’m not
saying the Church has always been on the forefront of science, but I
really wish people would stop using the Galileo as the go-to example of religion v.
science.
