I love house layouts. When I was a kid, I’d use building blocks
to make custom homes for my Polly Pockets and constantly rearrange the
furniture in my doll house. If bored, I’ll sketch out my dream estate layout,
which includes a house of hidden rooms and secret passageways and supporting structures of a self-sufficient farm. On my “if I win the lottery
list” is buying an old house and customizing each room.
There is something so alluring about creating that perfect
space. The indoors was created to keep out the weather and predators. But now we
can customize our indoors spaces to control the air quality, temperature,
humidity, sunlight, noise, lights, etc. We can design for our specific desires.
Rooms, houses, whole neighborhoods—custom-made to keep out whatever needs
keeping out.
But even while I fantasize about my manor with a hidden
bunker behind the wine cellar, I know that no design would ever completely
eliminate danger. I can prepare to be safer, but I can’t completely keep the
world at bay.
Some have tried. There are plenty of examples of people
going off to form their own communities, to reject the world and build their
utopia. The Puritans came to America to establish their “city upon a hill,”
away from heathen, tainted Europe. The goals of segregating always sound pure:
live according to our rules, uninfluenced by competing ideas, safe from those
that oppose us. It’s about safety—physical and ideological.
But that quickly devolves. Who is pure enough to stay in the
perfect place? Will a child raised in this utopian community be kicked out if
she believes something different? Will the poor, black man down the road be
allowed in?
How do you love your neighbors when you’re locked inside
your panic room? How do you evangelize when the only people you interact with
are prescreened and hand-selected? Maybe you survive the bomb or the virus, but
what values did you preserve?
A few years ago, The Benedict Option was quite
popular in certain crowds. Admittingly, I haven’t read the book, but I’ve read
a lot of responses (positive and negative) thinking on this idea of creating
community. Christians should be intentional about forming communities; parishes
should be family, not just a place to use on Wednesdays and Sundays. We should
cultivate our social circles with people that will edify us. Yet when we lay
people begin to cloister off, I feel it’s not for the pure goals of a “city
upon a hill.” I think it’s a rebuke on the world, writing it off as unsavable,
undeserving of our efforts. We have our security and salvation; the rest can
perish.
When the pandemic first started hitting New York, there were
stories of rich New Yorkers fleeing to their second homes. Villagers in these
small, rural places were pleading them not to, for they could bring the virus
to an area with very little medical resources to spare. Yet the rich wanted to feel
safe, and they had the means to retreat. Now, as the virus continues nation-wide
but schools are resuming, upper and middle class families with the means are creating
their own pods—small groups that can self-contain and educate their children
away from school. Families who have prepped rural retreats can simply step away
from the virus and riots and contention the year has brought.
How much is safety and how much is neglecting our neighbors?
The perfect space does not exist, because the world isn't perfect. We must strive for perfection within this imperfect world, We all need to be safe. Walls, roofs, locks, and masks, are
all prudent. But there is no security system, wall, moat, maze, or bunker that will
eliminate every threat. At some point, they may even eliminate compassion, charity,
and empathy. Open the door. There’s a whole world out there.