One of the beautiful things about the Catholic Church is that you can trace her exist back to the apostles. There is a lineage of sharing and sacrificing for the Gospel. We know where we come from. We are connected to the long line of Christians, throughout times and places, that shared in being members of the Church.
But that long line is also tainted by those who failed to
live up to the Gospel. We are connected to people who did horrible things and
used the name of Christ to justify them. And not just individual Catholics, but
leaders in the Church, and the institution itself. How can the Church hold the
summit of truth and be fed by the Body of Christ and still fail to care for
every soul? Why are there so many instances of the voices calling for justice
and dignity being drowned out by the lust for wealth, power, and comfort? What
do I do about being connected to this lineage of abuse and failure? It makes me
angry and sad.
Recently, I’ve been reading about the early European voyages
to the New World. There are explorers seeking fame and fortune, willing to kill
and enslave natives. There are missionaries moved to share the Gospel in these “unknown”
lands and defend the natives’ humanity. There are families seeking a refuge
from European turmoil. There is disease unintentionally devastating native
populations. And sometimes people where in multiple camps—coming to seek
shelter, willing to share the Gospel, yet still participating in barbarous acts
of pillaging, raping, enslaving, and killing.
And it has got me thinking about the Church’s response at
the time. Why wasn’t their outrage or directives against brutality and enslavement?
Did bishops and popes not see evil? Was the institutional Church too tied up to
the political climate to stand firm for the rights of all? What good is a kingdom
of God if it is indistinguishable from any other kingdom?
So, the next few posts are going to be about the Church’s
reaction to, and participation in, slavery. There are a few heroes, a lot of villains,
and a lot of nameless people whose lives, dignities, and souls were discarded
along the way.
To begin with, slavery has existed for almost as long as human
history, and in almost every culture in some manner. Often criminals, debtors,
or captures of war would be enslaved (or indentured until debts were paid). Sometimes
whole classes of people were slaves for life. It was often just a fact of life
that slavery existed in some form or another. The Bible has a lot to say about
how slaves are to be treated well, but it doesn’t condemn slavery as an
institution. The Israelites celebrate their freedom from Egypt and Babylon, yet
they too enslave debtors and those captures in war.
The New Testament again instructs masters to treat slaves
well, but it also instructs slaves to obey their masters, not to fight for
liberation. It all sounds frustratingly anti-abolitionist. Yet the New
Testament does include the radical idea that slaves and freed people are equal
in soul. "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor
free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians
3:28). Paul repeats several times this idea of equality among Christians. All
are made in the image of God, all are worthy of baptism, and all are able to be
saved. It is not a full denunciation of the existence of slavery, yet it does set
the precedent of seeing a slave as an equal in Christ, and, in time, seeing a
slave as an equal in every way, worthy of freedom and life.
No comments:
Post a Comment