History is written by the winners, they say. But that’s not
entirely true. Living in the South proves that. The Lost Cause narrative
sustained, even if it’s not the national narrative. There are still Rebel flags
and monuments to Jackson and Lee and reenactments of Confederate victories. The
reasons why these persist are varied, and yes, many of those reasons are rooted
in racism. The war was lost, the cause was wrong, but no one wants to say that
their boys died in vain. Losers write history too.
How historical times or events are remembered and
interpreted say more about the current times than those of the past. How
interpretation of the past shows how we want to connect the present to some
larger narrative. We want our times to make sense. We want to connect to
moments of victory or morality or innovation. We want assurances that we are
moving humanity the way it ought. So we fit our values and missions into the
larger historical context. We align past heroes to ourselves, obscuring
context. And when the stories don’t fit, they get reinterpreted or replaced
entirely.
After the Civil War, President Johnson pardoned the
Confederates. This was so that Southerners would not be punished by Northerners
thus continuing the division. Rather, Confederates were reabsorbed as
Americans, accepting the union and the label of American. That’s why in the
South, the Confederacy is often remembered as part of America—Americans fighting
Americans, i.e., a civil war. The regional memory is different than the
national memory, and the fight over statues is really a fight over the story.
Every group wants their story told, their memory validated. Collective memory
is at the core of a group’s identity. It is worth fighting for. So the struggle
to dictate the story can lead to violence and destruction.
Whether the statues should stay or go should be debated.
Personally, I think there are cases for some to stay and some to go, and it
would have to be determined on a case by case basis, factoring in the intent
when it was erected and the community’s past and present situations. Baltimore
city government decided to remove its statues before they became foci of
conflict. And they had a point. The statues have become tangible beacons of the
division of narratives. Letting a
frenzied mob tear down or vandalize property legitimizes chaos; it allows
emotional outbursts to win over civil social discourse. Politics becomes not
about rationalized ideology but about brute force.
Iconoclasts seek to erase history. They want to distance
themselves from a dark past and create a new utopia, free of any tainting,
residual influence. They want to purify themselves by sanitizing the landscape.
In doing so, they disregard the past, destroy art, damage buildings, desecrate
burial grounds.
We see iconoclasm in ISIS blowing up ancient sites, smashing
some of Christianity’s oldest churches and even Muslim holy places to dust. We see
it in the Red Guard destroying the Four Olds during the Chinese Cultural
Revolution. During the French Revolution, the heads of the statues of Notre
Dame were decapitated, and the cathedral became a Temple of Reason.
In the sixteenth century, the iconoclastic Protestants smashed
stained glass and statues and threw out relics.
This was beyond a reformation; it was obliteration. The Church, her art,
and her contributions were sought out to be erased. Along with political power,
the iconoclasts wanted control over the community memory, to shape history as
they wanted.
There are narratives that are truer and more just than
others. There are reasons to remove images that represent oppression. But we
must be careful from becoming iconoclasts, from believing that a purified landscape
and erased history will lead to a pure, new society. There are no pure societies.
There is nothing new under the sun.
In 1984, George
Orwell says, “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book
rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building
has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing
day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an
endless present in which the Party is always right.”
No comments:
Post a Comment