Or, Why Today May Be a Bigger Deal Than Some are Making It, but Smaller than Others are
I think one of the reasons Our Lady of Fatima attracts so
many devotees is the purported secrets. In her 1941 memoir, Sister Lucia said
that during the July 13, 1917 apparition, Mary had entrusted the children with
three secrets, which I’ll address out of order. The first two secrets were disclosed
in the 1940s, while the third was released in 2000.
The first secret was a vision of hell, which they
experienced on July 4, 1917, and explanation at the July 13 apparition that sinners
could be saved from hell through sacrifices and self-mortification. I think the
idea that the Blessed Mother showed young children harrowing visions of hell
and instructed self-mortification doesn’t line up with her natural character,
but either way, this secret seems pretty straightforward.
The third secret was a vision of religious people, led by the pope in white, going through a city of ruins, climbing a hill, and being martyred by soldiers with bullets and arrows. Sister Lucia has insisted this secret be publicly released by 1960, when it “will be more clearly understood.” Yet, in 1960, a Vatican press release said that the was "most probable the Secret would remain, forever, under absolute seal.” This led people to speculate that the secret foretold a worldwide or nuclear destruction that would incite mass panic or that officers within the Church were conspiring against the good of the Church in hiding the secret. In 2000, the Vatican finally published the text of the third secret, but speculation remained that parts of the secret were still withheld. In 2010, Pope Benedict XVI said that that was the full secret, and that it could have a specific reference to the assassination attempt of Pope John Paul II and an ongoing meaning of the suffering the Church, through persecution and through the sexual abuse scandal.
The second secret was a recommendation for devotion to the
Immaculate Heart of Mary for peace. Such devotion would lead to an end of the
Great War (WWI), but worse would come if people continued to offend God. This next
war would be preceded by a strange light in the sky. (Incidentally, on January
25, 1938, a rare aurora borealis appeared over the northern hemisphere as far
sough as North Africa and California. It was so bright that people in Europe
thought there were wildfires burning.)
To avert this worse war or time of chastisement, Mary
promised that if Russia were consecrated to her Immaculate Heart and First
Saturdays Devotions established, Russia would be converted and there would be
peace; if not, Russia would spread error throughout the world, causing more war
and persecution. The vision concluded that ultimately, the pope would
consecrate Russia and a period of peace would be granted. Although in July
1917, Russia was still under an Orthodox monarchy, many have interpreted this
secret as a warning against communism, as the Bolshevik Revolution would take
place just months later.
For many believers of Fatima, this secret is the key to stopping
the spread of secular/communist ideologies and bringing peace to the world. And
while popes have pronounced consecrations before, war has continued, leading
people to believe that the consecration must be done very specifically and has
yet to be truly fulfilled.
In 1942, Pope Pius XII (who, incidentally, was ordained a
bishop on May 13, 1917, the day of the first Fatima vision) consecrated the
entire human race to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and “in a most special
manner We entrust all the peoples of Russia to this Immaculate Heart.” At the
conclusion of the Second Vatican Council, Pope Paul VI renewed Pius’
consecration of the human race to the Immaculate Heart. In 1984, Pope John Paul
II also consecrated the entire world to Mary. Some maintain that the
consecration must be made of Russia specifically and only and that the pope
must make the consecration simultaneously with all the world’s bishops. Sister
Lucia reported said that the 1984 consecration accomplished the conditions
according the request in the apparition she received in 1929.
Which brings us to today. In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Pope Francis will consecrate Russia and Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. He has asked bishops and priests around the world to join him. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI has said he will join. They will pray the consecration at 5 p.m. Rome time, one of the best time periods to have Europe, Africa, North America, and South America awake and likely to participate simultaneously. The Archbishop of Sydney has even said he will open his cathedral at 2:30 a.m. in order to join simultaneously.
And if the war doesn’t cease, the hardline believers will
claim that including Ukraine in the consecration was wrong or that some bishops
did not participate. Those that want to believe in secrets and prophecies being
carried out will never accept that the third secret was fully released or that
the second secret’s requirements were met, because that’s just not as
interesting. I think devotees who put so much stock into the secrets want them
to be true because it’s exciting to live in a time of living out a prophecy.
They want to be a part of the visions; they want the knowledge of knowing why
things are going wrong (“you aren’t following Mary’s directions”). It makes us
special.
Personally, such strict and worldwide requirements in a
personal revelation for something as previously-unattained as world peace
seems…I’ll just say not likely. Still, I believe entrusting war-torn countries
to Mary and gathering as the truly universal Church to pray for peace is still
a good idea and still will bring about good. We should be praying for peace,
broadly and specifically. And during particularly tumultuous times, coming
together as one Church with a shared goal and prayer is powerful.
Further, there is a political aspect to all of this. The
Vatican is a country, but not one who participates in military maneuvers (I
mean, anymore) or take public stances against foreign leaders by name. But Pope
Francis’ decision to make this consecration now, one month since the Russian
invasion of Ukraine, is a decidedly political one, clearly demonstrating his
disagreement with Russia’s actions. Further, it is a statement against the
leader of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who has publicly supported
Russia’s actions. The Orthodox Church in Russia has a complicated and currently
uncomfortably close relationship with the government; forced underground during
the era of Soviet rule, yet now it is a powerful ally with Putin and a cultural
symbol of “Russian-ness” to nationalists.
In response to Francis’ call for prayer, Patriarch Kirill called
on the Russian Orthodox faithful to pray for peace through Mary, the Theotokos.
This may sound like they are asking for the same thing, and I believe ultimately,
the average Russian Orthodox praying for peace and the average Roman Catholic
praying for peace are equally sincere and heard. But Patriarch Kirill’s idea of
peace is that the faster Russia conquers Ukraine and gets what it wants, the
faster the violence will end.
On March 13, he presented an image of Mary to the Russian
National Guard in hopes, a national guard leader said, that it would “protect
the Russian army and bring our victory faster.” Patriarch Kirill has spoken
openly about how the Ukrainians are ethnically Rus, the same as Russians, thus
perpetuating the Russian claim that Ukraine should be closely allied to, if not
a part of, Russia and justifying Russian interference. He specifically called
out the dioceses of the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine who in response to
his support of invasion have broken communion from him, saying they fell victim
to “forces foreign to the Church that want to destroy the spiritual unity of
our peoples. When someone out of fear refuses to commemorate the Patriarch,
then this is a sign of weakness.”
Pope Francis has made efforts to work together with
religious leaders of other denominations and faiths throughout his pontificate,
including Patriarch Kirill. Last week, the two spoke. Pope Francis reportedly
said, “We are shepherds of the same Holy People who believe in God, in the Holy
Trinity, in the Holy Mother of God: that is why we must unite in the effort to
aid peace, to help those who suffer, to seek ways of peace, and to stop the
fire.”
Their words are religious, but the way they are using those
words and religious actions, are political responses to the current war. Like
in 1917. Like in 1941. Both probably sincerely want the protection of Mary’s
mantle. Both want peace. But what that looks like, and how we as a Church, as a
world, are to arrive there, are coming from totally different political
outlooks.
I do not think that war will end. Maybe this particular one
will. But not war itself. Not until the Second Coming. That doesn’t diminish
the power of praying for peace or make peacemaking a futile effort. It just
means that I think the people putting so much stock in the secrets of Fatima
are chasing a quick-fix, a utopia. While revelations and apparitions might be “worthy
of belief,” they must never supersede doctrine and the Gospel. We can grow in
faith through sacrifices and prayer, but they are not tasks in which we earn
salvation or peace. The key to everything is Christ’s Resurrection, not our
adherence to instructions given in a personal vision.
So, though I do not give much credence to this particular devotion, I will still join in with millions of others today in praying together for peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment