Queen Elizabeth II died on Sept. 8 at the age of 96. She had reigned as queen for 70 years. Although several monarchies still exist, the British royal family is easily the most famous and most watched royal family. Some rightly criticize the existence of monarchies, especially in countries where they have reduced power and elected officials. Yet, the families endure. And the fascination with monarchs and royalty continues. An estimated four billion people will tune in to watch the queen’s funeral tomorrow—a funeral procession and long Anglican church service doesn’t sound like record-breaking television, but we flock to the solemn pageantry.
All the pomp and pageantry makes sense when it’s for someone
beloved, when it marks stability, order, tradition. We are sad, but we are
safe, it says. We mourn, but all will be well. This has happened before, and we
know what to do.
I think in general people want a monarch, a caring custodian
who makes right and just decisions, guides our endeavors, and protects us from
our enemies. But power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There
are no benevolent dictators. The people have risen up against rulers again and
again due to abuse of power and corruption. Even democracy becomes tainted by
nepotism, oligarchs, and lobbyist bribes. We create systems and checks and
balances to try to fight against the corruption of power. But we hold onto this
idea that a good leader can emerge, that a good leader will make everything
alright and bring out the best in us. We want a leader worth following.
Many don’t remember any other ruler on the British throne.
Elizabeth was the monarchy. She was well-beloved, grandmotherly. She was proper
and above scandal (even when those closest to her weren’t). She was what we
want in a leader, one of those people who seemed above it all, wise and in
control. All the pomp and pageantry makes sense when it’s for someone beloved,
when it marks stability, order, tradition. We are sad, but we are safe, it
says. We mourn, but all will be well. This has happened before, and we know
what to do.
When someone comes along that appears to genuinely care and duty more than wealth and power, we laud her. We cling to her, carve her likeness in stone, mythologize her to serve as an example in the future. Washington, Lincoln, Churchill: flawed individuals but heralded. The legend, the hagiography, tells us good leaders can exist. So we hope. We look for the worthy. In our best days, we demand it, and leaders face just consequences for failing us.
When a good leader dies, the mourn both the person and the
legend. Will someone of equal virtue step up? Will our next leader be good or
bad? Was our security tied up with a larger-than-life, too-good-to-be-true
figure? The pageantry comforts us, but is it true demonstration or illusion?
When we say Christ is king, we done mean another national
monarch like our earthly kings, or presidents, or mayors. Christ is that
monarch we want, the one who carefully oversees his land and people, who would
sacrifice himself for our good, who seeks our wellness and decries accumulating
wealth, and who dispenses true justice and maintains peace. So, we proclaim “Christ is king."
No comments:
Post a Comment