I usually shy away
from latest pop culture faux outrage war distractions. Who cares about red
Starbucks cups or the Ten Commandments in courthouses except journalists who
need to fill airtime and column length? But yes, I will delve into this one.
Instead the debate
was about Disney’s first “openly gay” character and his “gay moment” and the
boycotting of the film based on that. First off, I doubt that it is indeed
Disney’s first openly gay character. Characters sexual interests aren’t always
on display in children’s film, seeing as they have nothing to do with the plot
(Frollo et al offering exceptions). It certainly, in my opinion, isn’t the
first Disney film to have a gay character. As for first “openly gay?” Maybe, depending
on what one has to do to qualify as “openly.” But it seems regressive to
blatantly single out that aspect of the character and call that monumental.
If we're going to explore a side character, wouldn't be more interesting to have a character struggling with never being popular/strong/handsome enough and dealing with the jealousy and idealization he has for his friend? And how does Gaston react, helping the poor guy or basking in the power he holds over him? My problem with
LeFou’s added open gayness isn’t the normalizing of homosexuality or a studio pushing
an agenda and evangelicals getting over-reactionary (haven’t they supposed to
have been boycotting Disney since the ‘90s anyway?). My problem is that an
interesting interpersonal dynamic is reduced to sex. Again.
Our culture
sexualizes everything. Two people can be friends, but if they are too friendly,
then it is sexual. Intimacy is a sign of sexual feelings; it is assumed
everyone is repressing or expressing attraction. LeFou can’t have an obsessive
admiration for another man without it being sexual. This over-elevates sexual
attraction to the height of relationship. And it undermines other interpersonal
dynamics of intimacy, kindredness, and friendship. A true friendship is deeper
and more intimate than plain sexual compatibility. Our culture does not value
intimate friendship. Deep, platonic love doesn’t sell.
I want more movies
that value platonic soulmates. I want characters who love one another and are
the most important person in each other’s lives and who have zero sexual
interest. I want friendship properly valued and celebrated. I want sexual
interest to be only a component of a deeper relationship, and I want romance to
grow organically.
I know that’s a lot
of ask of a Disney children’s film. But children’s films often tackle heavy
issues. And they reflect the values of the surrounding culture, which is why
it’s so disheartening to see the sexualization of a character that need not be
sexualized. After all, who needs superfluous sexual desire when there’s “far
off places, daring swordfights, magic spells, [and] a prince in disguise?”
No comments:
Post a Comment